Monitor

Summary

The Summary section provides you with a clear, structured overview of peer and self-evaluation results at team level. It is designed to help you quickly interpret contributions, identify patterns, and take action.

Peer & Self Evaluation Monitor summary

Team Overview

Each team is displayed as a collapsible panel, for example:

• Team Code Blue Crew

• Team Grey Matter Collective

• Team IV Leaguers

Criteria-Based Results

Within each team, results are organised by the evaluation criteria you defined. Each criterion appears as a separate item:

Example

Contribution to Clinical Discussion

View star ratings and associated comments helping you who contributed most effectively and overall quality of participation and reasoning.

Report star rating criteria (likert scales)

Overall Contribution to the Group Task (Ranking)

Displays how students ranked each other (and themselves). Allows you to identify top contributors, detect low participation and see consistency or disagreement in rankings

Report ranking criteria

The lower the rank indicates top ranked individual

Distribution of Contribution (Hedging)

Shows how students allocated points across the team members. Provides you an insight into:

• Perceived effort and contribution

• Whether contribution was balanced or uneven

• This feeds directly into SPA calculations for fairness

Report hedging criteria

Qualitative Constructive Feedback (Comments)

Displays qualitative feedback provided by students. You can review: strengths highlighted, areas for improvement and specific examples of behaviour.

Report qualitative criteria

Gives you insights into

• Understanding team dynamics

• Identifying communication or collaboration issues

Rubrics

Shows rubric-based evaluations for the team. Allows you to review performance against structured criteria and identify strengths and weaknesses across key competencies.

Report rubrics criteria

Share Results with Students

Notify team members of results: sends each student their peer and self-evaluation results

Analytics

The Analytics section provides a team-level overview of activity completion, allowing you to quickly see which teams have completed the evaluation, which are in progress, and which have not started.

This is especially useful for managing participation, timing, and follow-up actions.

Team Completion Summary

Each team is displayed as a separate card, giving you a clear snapshot of their progress.

Team Name

• Displays the name of the team (e.g. Team Code Blue Crew)

• Helps you quickly identify and compare teams

---

Completion Status Badge

Each team has a clear status indicator:

• Complete (green) → All students have finished

• In progress (yellow) → Some students have completed

• Not started (grey) → No students have begun

Advanced Settings

The Settings section in the monitoring interface allows you to review and adjust key behaviour settings of the activity, even after it has been deployed.

This gives you flexibility to control visibility, reflection, and integrity of the evaluation process.