# Monitor ## Summary The **Summary section** provides you with a **clear, structured overview of peer and self-evaluation results at team level**. It is designed to help you **quickly interpret contributions, identify patterns, and take action**.

### Team Overview Each team is displayed as a **collapsible panel**, for example: * *Team Code Blue Crew* * *Team Grey Matter Collective* * *Team IV Leaguers* ### Criteria-Based Results Within each team, results are organised by the **evaluation criteria you defined**. Each criterion appears as a separate item: ## Example #### Contribution to Clinical Discussion View **star ratings** and associated comments helping you **who contributed most effectively** and overall **quality of participation and reasoning**.

Report star rating criteria (likert scales)

#### Overall Contribution to the Group Task (Ranking) Displays how **students ranked each other** (and themselves). Allows you to **identify top contributors**, **detect low participation** and **see consistency or disagreement** in rankings

{% hint style="info" %} **The lower the rank indicates top ranked individual** {% endhint %} #### Distribution of Contribution (Hedging) Shows how students **allocated points across the team members.** Provides you an insight into: * **Perceived effort and contribution** * **Whether contribution was balanced or uneven** * **This feeds directly into SPA calculations for fairness**

#### Qualitative Constructive Feedback (Comments) Displays **qualitative feedback** provided by students. You can review: **strengths highlighted**, **areas for improvement** and **specific examples of behaviour**.

{% hint style="info" %} ### Gives you insights into * Understanding team dynamics * Identifying communication or collaboration issues {% endhint %} #### Rubrics Shows **rubric-based evaluations** for the team. Allows you to review performance against **structured criteria** and identify **strengths and weaknesses across key competencies**.

### Share Results with Students Notify team members of results: sends each student their peer and self-evaluation results ## Analytics The **Analytics section** provides a **team-level overview of activity completion**, allowing you to quickly see **which teams have completed the evaluation, which are in progress, and which have not started**. This is especially useful for managing **participation, timing, and follow-up actions**.

### Team Completion Summary Each team is displayed as a separate card, giving you a clear snapshot of their progress. #### Team Name * Displays the name of the team (e.g. *Team Code Blue Crew*) * Helps you quickly identify and compare teams *** #### Completion Status Badge Each team has a clear status indicator: * **Complete (green)** → All students have finished * **In progress (yellow)** → Some students have completed * **Not started (grey)** → No students have begun ## Advanced Settings The **Settings section** in the monitoring interface allows you to r**eview and adjust key behaviour settings of the activity**, even after it has been deployed. This gives you flexibility to **control visibility, reflection, and integrity of the evaluation process**.

--- # Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter: ``` GET https://docs.lamsfoundation.org/lams/tools/peer-and-self-evaluation/monitor.md?ask= ``` The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.