# Self & Peer Review

Periodically, you might want to include a self & peer review evaluation. As this is not a stage that is always required and if you leave it blank will not include this activity in the TBL design.

When included though, this final step allows you to create a set of criteria for the students to rate each other using a 5-star rating.

Additionally, to the rating criteria, you can add a qualitative justification that the student need to complete along with their rating. When doing so, the students would not only need to rate their self and their peers, but also provide a valid justification for their rating.&#x20;

![Adding Self & Peer Review](/files/-MRTgUxX6tPOKhGLLJU9)

{% hint style="success" %}
**It's optional**

Note that if you **decide not to add any criteria**, the Self & Peer Review activity **will not be included** to the TBL design.&#x20;
{% endhint %}

**Rating is not the only type of peer assessment** option that you can add -though, it is the most commonly used therefore we added it to the wizard.&#x20;

Aside from rating, you can also use **rankings** -where given a particular criteria, students need to rank their team members in a scale (ie: 1st position, 2nd, 3rd, etc).&#x20;

Additionally, you can use **points distribution (aka Michaelsen's method**), where you give the student a number of points or marks that s/he has distribute between the other peers.&#x20;

&#x20;After the Self & Peer Review criteria is added or omitted, then the TBL  design can be save by pressing the “**Save**” button.

![](/files/-MRTjZldIIzDdyByF6Ei)

**Voila!** You have created your first TBL learning design!


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.lamsfoundation.org/tbl/tbl-for-teachers/getting-started/tbl-design-wizard-1/self-and-peer-review.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
