Team-Based Learning
  • Team-Based Learning
  • Why would I use TBL?
    • Transition to TBL
  • TBL Process
  • TBL with LAMS
  • TBL for Teachers
    • Getting Started
      • Create TBL lessons with LAMS Generative AI
      • TBL Design Wizard
        • Launch TBL Wizard
        • Design Details & Teams
        • Readiness Assurance Questions
        • Application Exercises
        • Self & Peer Review
      • TBL Features & Customisations
    • Creating a Lesson
    • Monitoring a TBL Lesson
      • TBL Monitor
    • TBL How-To
      • General TBL
      • Teams
      • iRATs
      • tRATs
      • App Exercises
      • Self & Peer Evaluation
      • TBL Facilitation
    • Analytics
    • TBL Design Examples
    • Research & Projects
    • Team Inclusion & Diversity
    • Glossary & Acronyms
  • TBL For Students
    • TBL as Student
    • Student's TBL Guide
      • Preparation Work
      • Teams & Team Formation
      • Individual Test (iRAT)
      • Selecting a Team Leader
      • Team Test (tRAT)
      • Mini Lecture
      • Application Exercises
      • Self & Peer Review
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • What peer review question types does it support?
  • Rating
  • Ranking
  • Hedging
  • Rubrics 🆕
  • Comment
  • Can students see feedback left for them and others?
  • Can I do Peer Evaluation without Self evaluation?
  • Does it also support Self-Assessment?
  • Can students also evaluate the teacher/facilitator?
  • Can I export the peer evaluation feedback?
  • What feedback students get?
  • What happens if some students are missing in the teams for Peer Review?
  • What are the best questions and practices for Self & Peer Review?
  • SPA (Self and Peer Assessment) Factor
  • SAPA (Self-Assessment to Peer Assessment) Factor:
  1. TBL for Teachers
  2. TBL How-To

Self & Peer Evaluation

Because life is always better with a bit of feedback! 👍

PreviousApp ExercisesNextTBL Facilitation

Last updated 4 months ago

What peer review question types does it support?

So far, we've got four different question types that you can use for self & peer evaluation:

Rating

When you add a criterion for evaluation to be rated, then students are able to use a 0 to 5 star rating to evaluate each other.

You can require how many of their peers have to be rated before the student can finish the peer assessment.

For instance, if there are 6 students in a team, you can set that each student has to at least rate a minimum of three peers. Additionally, you can also add a maximum number of students to rate.

Justifying ratings

When using ratings for peer evaluation, you can ask students to justify why the ratings they give to their peers. This is quite useful as it forces the student to think carefully why he/she is given the said mark. Moreover, avoids the always tempting option that students have to give everyone five stars! 😃

Ranking

Another option for Peer review is "Ranking". This will allow you to set a criterion for the students to rank their fellow colleagues.

Hedging

Rubrics 🆕

From LAMS version 4.6, you can make use of sophisticated rubrics for peer and self evaluation

Comment

You can also have open text feedback too and set limits for min and max words.

Can students see feedback left for them and others?

Yes, and it's configurable.

This means that if you don't want the students to see their feedback until everyone has finished or you want to look at the feedback yourself first, before disclosing it to students, you can choose to do that.

The option "After completion, ashow feedback left for the current student", when enabled will display to the student feedback given from others to him/her.

Also, the option "After completion, show feedback left for other students" will show the student the feedback that s/he has left for others.

You can enable one or the other, or both if you prefer.

Can I do Peer Evaluation without Self evaluation?

Certainly!

Just uncheck the option "Allow self review" and students will only be able to evaluate their peers.

Does it also support Self-Assessment?

Can students also evaluate the teacher/facilitator?

The Peer Review tool is only for students. If you want students to evaluate the teacher, the TBL facilitators or the TBL process, then use the Survey tool instead.

The survey tool allows you to create very useful questions to collect this feedback.

Can I export the peer evaluation feedback?

What feedback students get?

What happens if some students are missing in the teams for Peer Review?

What are the best questions and practices for Self & Peer Review?

SPA (Self and Peer Assessment) Factor

The SPA factor is a fairness adjustment score that reflects how much each team member contributed to a group task, based on the ratings given by their peers and their own self-assessment.

How is the SPA Factor Calculated?

Step 1: Ratings from Peers

  • Each student rates the contribution of their peers (e.g., on a scale from 1 to 10).

  • They also rate their own contribution.

Step 2: Average Rating

  • The system calculates the average rating that each student receives from their peers.

Step 3: Proportionate Adjustment (SPA Factor)

  • The SPA factor for each student is the ratio of their average rating to the average rating of the entire team.

Formula:

SPA Factor=Average rating received by the studentAverage rating for the entire team\text{SPA Factor} = \frac{\text{Average rating received by the student}}{\text{Average rating for the entire team}}SPA Factor=Average rating for the entire teamAverage rating received by the student​
  • If SPA Factor > 1: The student contributed more than the average team member.

  • If SPA Factor < 1: The student contributed less than the average team member.

  • If SPA Factor = 1: The student contributed equally compared to the team average.

What Does the SPA Factor Do?

The SPA factor is used to adjust the student’s individual score for a group task:

  • Adjusted Score = Team Score × SPA Factor

For example, if the group received 80% for a project and a student’s SPA factor is 1.2 (i.e., they contributed more), their individual score becomes:

80%×1.2=96%80\% \times 1.2 = 96\%80%×1.2=96%

Similarly, if another student’s SPA factor is 0.8 (i.e., they contributed less), their individual score becomes:

80%×0.8=64%80\% \times 0.8 = 64\%80%×0.8=64%

SAPA (Self-Assessment to Peer Assessment) Factor:

The SAPA factor compares how a student rates themselves versus how their peers rate them.

How is the SAPA Factor Calculated?

Step 1: Self-Rating vs. Peer Rating

  • The student gives themselves a score.

  • The average score their peers give them is calculated.

Step 2: Comparison of Ratings

  • The SAPA factor is the ratio of the self-rating to the peer rating.

Formula:

SAPA Factor=Self-ratingAverage peer rating\text{SAPA Factor} = \frac{\text{Self-rating}}{\text{Average peer rating}}SAPA Factor=Average peer ratingSelf-rating​
  • If SAPA Factor > 1: The student rated themselves higher than their peers did (overestimation).

  • If SAPA Factor < 1: The student rated themselves lower than their peers did (underestimation).

  • If SAPA Factor = 1: The student’s self-rating matches their peers’ ratings.

Why is the SAPA Factor Important?

The SAPA factor aids in identifying students who may misjudge their contributions. Instructors can leverage it to enhance feedback on self-awareness and reflective practices.

Example

Self-rating: 9 out of 10

Average peer rating: 7 out of 10

SAPA Factor=97=1.29\text{SAPA Factor} = \frac{9}{7} = 1.29SAPA Factor=79​=1.29 This means the student is rating themselves 29% higher than their peers think they should.

The SAPA factor measures the difference between self-perception and peer perception, helping assess self-awareness.

This way of assessment in TBL is called the , which consist of splitting a given amount of points along team members based on a designated criterion.

Yes, see .

Yes. From you are able to export all the feedback that the students have given to each other for all criteria in all question types. The exported file (in Excel) is broken down by teams/groups.

As you saw , you can get students to receive feedback from other straight away.

Additionally students are able to via email with all the given feedback.

See .

For a few years, we've been working on regarding Self & Peer Evaluation and while we are far from having an exhaustive analysis, as well as and comparison have worked out very well.

Michaelsen method
research projects
CATME peer evaluation questions
Sparkplus factors for analysis
previous question
before
Peer evaluation monitor
get a full report
Manage missing students
Adding star rating as peer review
Student rating their peers
Adding ranking as peer evaluation
Student ranking peers
Adding point hedging for peer evalution
Creating a set of rubrics for Self & Peer Evaluation
Student giving qualitative feedback to peers.
Selecting feedback to display after peer evaluation completion
Disabling self-evaluation